Poland’s Crypto Bill Veto Survives After Parliament Falls 25 Votes Short

By CoinAINews Staff

September 7, 2026

Poland’s parliament has failed for the third time to overturn President Karol Nawrocki’s veto of a cryptocurrency regulation bill, leaving the country’s planned domestic crypto-asset framework in limbo.

The Sejm, Poland’s lower house of parliament, voted on September 4 to override the presidential veto. The motion received 241 votes in favor, 198 against and three abstentions among 442 lawmakers who voted. A three-fifths majority of 266 votes was required, leaving the override attempt 25 votes short.

Poland’s Crypto Bill Remains Blocked

The failed vote means President Nawrocki’s veto remains in force and the latest version of the crypto regulation bill cannot move forward through a successful veto override.

The legislation was intended to establish a national regulatory framework for crypto-assets and give Poland’s Financial Supervision Authority, known as KNF, a central role in supervising the sector.

The vote is particularly important because the European Union’s Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation (MiCA) is already in effect. Poland’s problem is not whether MiCA exists, but how the country organizes its domestic supervisory and licensing framework around the EU rules.

How the Sejm Vote Ended

Vote	Result
Lawmakers voting	442
For overriding the veto	241
Against	198
Abstained	3
Votes required	266
Shortfall	25 votes

Because the three-fifths threshold was not reached, the president’s veto was not overturned. Polish media reported that this was the third attempt to push the legislation through after presidential opposition.

Why Did President Karol Nawrocki Veto the Bill?

President Karol Nawrocki has not opposed the idea of regulating cryptocurrencies altogether. His objections have focused on the structure and scope of the proposed legislation.

Nawrocki has argued that the government-backed framework could impose excessive regulatory and compliance burdens on the crypto industry. His position has been that Poland needs rules that protect consumers and the financial system without unnecessarily discouraging legitimate businesses.

The president’s third veto came after lawmakers approved the latest version of the legislation in May. Reporting on the dispute says Nawrocki had previously raised a series of objections to the bill and maintained that many of those concerns had not been adequately addressed.

What Does the Failed Vote Mean for MiCA?

The failed veto override does not cancel MiCA. MiCA is an EU regulation and continues to apply across the European Union.

The issue for Poland is its domestic supervisory framework.

Poland’s financial regulator, KNF, said on September 4 that the country still had not designated a competent authority for supervision of the crypto-assets market.

That distinction matters for crypto businesses. EU-wide rules can establish common requirements, but national authorities still have important responsibilities involving supervision and authorization of crypto-asset service providers.

Poland’s transition period for certain existing crypto-asset service providers also reached its July 1, 2026 deadline under the relevant MiCA provisions, according to information published by KNF.

Why Crypto Companies Are Watching Poland

The regulatory uncertainty could make it harder for businesses to determine how they should navigate licensing and supervision within Poland.

The proposed legislation was designed to give KNF a clearer statutory role in overseeing crypto-asset activities. Without the bill becoming law, that domestic framework remains unresolved.

This does not mean that cryptocurrency itself has been banned in Poland. Instead, the country remains caught between an EU-level regulatory framework and an unfinished national implementation structure.

The Zondacrypto Investigation Adds Pressure

The latest parliamentary debate also took place against the backdrop of an investigation involving the failed Polish crypto exchange Zondacrypto.

Prime Minister Donald Tusk cited the case while urging lawmakers to support the veto override. However, the investigation and the crypto regulation bill are separate matters, and allegations connected to the investigation should not be treated as established facts unless confirmed through the legal process.

The political dispute nevertheless added urgency to the broader discussion about consumer protection, supervision and enforcement in Poland’s crypto market.

What Happens Next for Poland’s Crypto Regulation?

The failed override means the current legislation remains blocked by the presidential veto.

The political focus may now shift toward whether lawmakers can produce a revised framework that addresses the president’s objections while still giving Poland a functioning domestic structure for supervising crypto-asset activities.

For the industry, the key issue is whether Warsaw can resolve the regulatory gap without creating rules that businesses consider excessively burdensome.

For investors, the latest vote is mainly a regulatory development rather than a direct change to the operation of Bitcoin, Ethereum or other cryptocurrencies.

What the Poland Crypto Vote Means in Simple Terms

• President Karol Nawrocki vetoed Poland’s crypto regulation bill.
• The Sejm tried to overturn the veto on September 4.
• 241 lawmakers voted in favor of the override.
• 198 voted against it and three abstained.
• 266 votes were required.
• The override therefore failed by 25 votes.
• This was the third failed attempt to overcome the presidential veto.
• The bill would have established a stronger domestic framework for crypto-asset supervision, including a central role for KNF.
• MiCA remains applicable as EU law; the unresolved issue is Poland’s domestic supervisory framework.

Frequently Asked Questions

Did Poland overturn President Karol Nawrocki’s crypto bill veto?

No. The Sejm failed to obtain the three-fifths majority required to override the veto.

How many votes were needed to override the Poland crypto bill veto?

The Sejm needed 266 votes. The motion received 241 votes, leaving it 25 votes short.

What was the result of the Poland crypto bill vote?

There were 241 votes in favor of overriding the veto, 198 against and three abstentions among 442 lawmakers who voted.

Was this the first time Poland tried to overturn the crypto bill veto?

No. The September vote was the third attempt to overcome presidential opposition to the crypto legislation.

Does the failed vote mean MiCA does not apply in Poland?

No. MiCA remains an EU regulation. The unresolved issue is Poland’s domestic framework for supervising and authorizing crypto-asset activities. KNF said on September 4 that Poland had still not designated a competent authority for supervision of the crypto-assets market.

What regulator would oversee crypto under the proposed Polish framework?

The legislation was designed to give Poland’s Financial Supervision Authority, or KNF, a central supervisory role in the crypto-asset market.

What happens after the failed veto override?

The current bill remains blocked. Further legislative action or a revised proposal would be needed to move Poland toward a new domestic crypto regulatory framework.

Sources

• Sejm of the Republic of Poland — September 4, 2026 Voting Record
• Polish Financial Supervision Authority (KNF) — Statement on the Lack of a Competent Crypto-Asset Supervisory Authority
• KNF — End of the MiCA Transitional Period for Certain Crypto-Asset Service Providers
• Polsat News — Sejm Vote on the Presidential Crypto Bill Veto

Editorial note: CoinAINews has separated confirmed parliamentary facts from political allegations and has not treated allegations connected to the Zondacrypto investigation as proven wrongdoing.